Subject	They don't 'have' to be anything.
Posted by	SactoTodd on October 10, 2003 at 1:18 PM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	What would they have to be? 2.5? 2.25 fine for N/A's? (n/m) posted by Malukalu99 on October 10, 2003 at 12:56 PM
Message	2.25 is restrictive, but they will work. 2.5 is kind of the 'should be', but others argue that 3.0 'works better' than 2.25 IMHO, split downpipes are a waste of money for an NA. -Todd
Follow Ups	Anyone install Top Fuel Downpipes & Divorced pipes? - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 12:20:53 10/10/03 They are 2.25" which makes it a wasted effort IMHO. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:35:49 10/10/03 Re: They are 2.25" which makes it a wasted effort IMHO. - ZigZag 14:04:23 10/10/03 My main concern was really just the fitment, wanted to make - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 14:41:30 10/10/03 You don't want backpressure on a turbo car. NA cars are dif (n/m) - Scotts94z32 19:05:45 10/10/03 2.25" DPs and TPs are better than stock pre/main cats >>>> - KaZ (VaBch) 15:07:10 10/10/03 Also at $305 shipped, its a LOT cheaper than $700 >>> - KaZ (VaBch) 15:11:36 10/10/03 Good point, I'll bring it up to the owner. (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 16:15:20 10/10/03 What would they have to be? 2.5? 2.25 fine for N/A's? (n/m) - Malukalu99 12:56:57 10/10/03 They don't 'have' to be anything. - SactoTodd 13:18:14 10/10/03 ehhh ... (n/m) - Guapo 13:20:02 10/10/03 ? (n/m) - Malukalu99 13:51:19 10/10/03 N/A's don't have turbos... - BigTDogg (ZCON Whore) 13:56:58 10/10/03 I know that, I'm just wondering why Guapo said "ehh" - Malukalu99 15:02:00 10/10/03 because NA's don't have downpipes. - Guapo 15:32:04 10/10/03 Where on Earth did that sig animation come from? (n/m) - therinL 14:25:16 10/10/03 www.streetneeds.com (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 14:33:44 10/10/03 They look good and DPs bolt up no problem... - KaZ (VaBch) 15:09:38 10/10/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.